ANALYSIS OF THE STANDARD BUILT BY THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON PROOF IN CRIMES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AT THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF THE ESCEPTIC INTERPRETATION

Authors

  • Yady Marcela FLOREZ LÓPEZ
  • Diego León GÓMEZ MARTÍNEZ

Keywords:

Inter-American Court, Jurisprudence, Violence against women, Interpretation, Belém Do Para Convention

Abstract

 

This article is the result of an investigation that had as its object the descriptive analysis of jurisprudence emanating from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights before and after the application of the Belém Do Convention, in which there was a factual pattern of violence against the woman.

Author Biographies

Yady Marcela FLOREZ LÓPEZ

Master in International Relations from the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. Lawyer from the Santiago de Cali University

Diego León GÓMEZ MARTÍNEZ

PhD candidate in Law from the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. Lawyer and Master in Law from the Santiago de Cali University (USC). Master in Global Rule of Law and Constitutional Democracy at the Università degli Studi di Genova - Instituto Tarello per la Filosofía de Diritto Exdecano and professor at the Faculty of Law at the Santiago de Cali University. Member of the GICPODERI research group. Associate researcher (I) categorized by COLCIENCIAS.

Published

2021-07-01

How to Cite

FLOREZ LÓPEZ, Y. M. ., & GÓMEZ MARTÍNEZ, D. L. . (2021). ANALYSIS OF THE STANDARD BUILT BY THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON PROOF IN CRIMES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AT THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF THE ESCEPTIC INTERPRETATION. RIDP REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE DERECHO PÚBLICO - ISSN 2954-3924, 1(01), 185–216. Retrieved from https://ridp.udem.edu/revista/index.php/dp/article/view/17